Layered DRT

نویسندگان

  • Bart Geurts
  • Emar Maier
چکیده

The information conveyed by any utterance is a motley ensemble. Utterances carry content about the world as it is according to the speaker, but also about speakers’ attitudes, the way they speak, what has been said before, and so on. There are many kinds of information that are conveyed by way of language, and differences in kind correlate with differences in status. Presupposed information exhibits a distinctive projection behaviour; conversational implicatures are cancellable in a way that asserted information is not; a pronoun’s gender may help to determine a referent, but is otherwise truth-conditionally inert; and so on. Interpreting utterances is as much a matter of integrating these various kinds of information as of keeping them apart. This much is uncontroversial. As far as we are aware, however, no attempts have been made thus far to devise a fully general framework within which processes of information integration can be modeled. There are partial theories, to be sure. For example, there are quite a few well-developed analyses of the interaction between presupposed and non-presupposed content. But to the best of our knowledge the problem of information integration as such has not been addressed before. So that is what this paper is about: a general framework for representing and integrating all and sundry kinds of information that can be conveyed by linguistic means. This may seem like a grandiose project, and perhaps it is, but it is less ambitious than one might think. Our aim in this paper is to develop a framework for representing different kinds of linguistic and

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Some Diierent Approaches to Drt

This paper discusses some issues in various approaches to Discourse Representation Theory. This is not intended to be detailed descriptions of various systems but general comparisons between both implementations of DRT and descriptions of DRT in some other context (e.g. a situation theoretic framework). The intention is to show how close (or how diierent) these approaches are and which aspects ...

متن کامل

Consequence Relations In DRT

We discuss some consequence relations in DRT useful to discourse semantics. We incorporate some consequence relations into DRT using se-quent calculi. We also show some connections of these consequence relations and existing partial logics. Our attempt enables us to display several versions of DRT by employing different consequence relations.

متن کامل

Accessible Referents in “Opaque” Belief Contexts

Problem(s) (for possible-worlds semantics) discussed: accessible ref’s in “opaque” context ◙ “Hob-Nob sentences” (referential dependence between different people’s believes) 3 ◙ Benz’s (2000) puzzle concerning common ground 4 ◙ modal anchoring (Farkas 1993, Roberts 1996:243) 5 ◙ “Huitink’s paradox” (Zeevat 2005:547) 6 ◙ strange cases of (mis)understanding (Alberti 2005b,d) 7 Essence of our prop...

متن کامل

Why Do Demand Responsive Transport Systems Fail ?

In developed countries, Demand Responsive Transport (DRT) (loosely termed ‘paratransit’ in US parlance) emerged in the 1970s to serve the specialist niche market of people with mobility difficulties. DRT systems are starting become a mainstream public transport mode and this paper examines mainstream public transport DRT schemes from around the world that have failed, in order to identify the r...

متن کامل

DRT Representation of Degrees of Belief

This paper investigates the problems facing modelling agents’ beliefs in Discourse Representation Theory (DRT) and presents a viable solution in the form of a dialogue-based DRT representation of beliefs. Integrating modelling dialogue interaction into DRT allows modelling agents’ beliefs, intentions and mutual beliefs. Furthermore, it is one of the aims of the paper to account for the importan...

متن کامل

Pragmatic Discourse Representation Theory

This paper presents a pragmatic approach to Discourse Representation Theory (DRT) in an attempt to address the pragmatic limitations of DRT (Werth 1999; Simons 2003). To achieve a more pragmatic DRT model, this paper extends standard DRT framework to incorporate more pragmatic elements such as representing agents’ cognitive states and the complex process through which agents recognize utterance...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003